I went through a few stages of making my first draft. The first thing that I did was sat down at my desk in my room, and put some music on quietly in the background. I then thought of ideas for the rhetorical ecology that my project would be about. For me, this part of the process took the longest, and I found that it was hard for me to decide on a single topic to make the project about. After I had finally decided on a rhetorical ecology, I created the rest of the map from there. I found it was easy to come up with rhetorical elements and concepts once I had finally decided on a rhetorical ecology. While working on this project, I kept in mind that it is only a draft that I was working on, so I tried to make my ideas as broad as possible so that it would be easier to refine my ideas instead of completely replace them. I enjoyed reading what Anne Lamont had to say about first drafts. I agree with what she says about how all first drafts are “shitty” and it definitely made me feel better about the first drafts that I have written. When I write a first draft, I usually don’t worry about things like grammar and consistency. While writing a first draft, I normally just try my best to get as many ideas as I can onto the paper, and then over time I refine the gibberish that I started with to make it into a coherent piece of work. Lamont’s writing, in a way, justified my writing process, and provided me we a sense of reassurance for the high amounts of “shitty” writing in my first drafts. Lamont’s writing made me feel better about myself and my rough draft process.
What Lamont had to say about first drafts made me feel a lot better about my writing too.
LikeLike
I agree when you say that you found identifying rhetorical elements fairly simple, I feel as though at times those qualities are easy to identify when you are a deep-rooted member in the ecology.
LikeLike
i like the idea of broad ideas, to allow easy revisions and specification
LikeLike